Paleonet: Fossil siphonophora

[Roger Thomas]

However, it is with Velella that Scenella has been compared, so this  
would also not be a siphonophoran if this relationship hold up.


On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:08 AM, Patricio Domínguez wrote:

Have a look to the different interpretations of Scenella

__
Dr. Patricio DOMINGUEZ
Dep. Paleontologia. Fac. Ciencias Geologicas.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
28040 Madrid (Spain)


-----Mensaje original-----
De: paleonet-bounces at nhm.ac.uk [mailto:paleonet-bounces at nhm.ac.uk] En  
nombre
de Theropod
Enviado el: miércoles, 04 de febrero de 2009 23:32
Para: PaleoNet
Asunto: Paleonet: Fossil siphonophora

Is there any fossil record for the Siphonophora?  I have run across
records based on velellids and porpitids but those are no longer
considered siphonophorans. I suppose the lack of a record would hardly
be surprising, but I may have simply missed something.

Thanks

Dan Chure
Dinosaur National Monument

_______________________________________________
Paleonet mailing list
Paleonet at nhm.ac.uk
http://mailman.nhm.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/paleonet


_______________________________________________
Paleonet mailing list
Paleonet at nhm.ac.uk
http://mailman.nhm.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/paleonet

___________________________________________
Roger D. K. Thomas
John Williamson Nevin Professor of Geosciences
Chair, Department of Earth and Environment
Secretary, The Paleontological Society
___________________________________
Department of Earth and Environment
Franklin & Marshall College
P.O. Box 3003
Lancaster
Pennsylvania 17604-3003
______________________________
Office telephone:  	717-291-4135
Office fax:    			717-291-4186
Home telephone:   	717-560-0486
http://www.fandm.edu/x7863.xml

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.paleonet.org/pipermail/paleonet/attachments/20090205/9ddbd187/attachment.htm>