PaleoNet: [EXTERN] Re: Downsizing
Mike Everhart
mike at oceansofkansas.com
Wed Apr 3 15:49:33 UTC 2024
Interesting problem... I'm wondering what I should do to preserve mine....
Not terribly large (300+ gigs) ... accumulated over the last 35+
years... mostly on the paleontology of the Western Interior Seaway....
Safe for now... but after I'm gone... who cares?
Mike Everhart
> "Downsizing is hard"
>
>
> Dear paleonetters
>
> I experience similar things, and also see similar things happen with
> colleagues' hand libraries.
>
>
> Just few months before retirement I accumulated quite some volume of a
> personal hand library in my field of expertise, over decades.
>
> It not only has a number of literature that is virtually difficult to
> obtain today (often it took considerable effort to find out, collect)
> but as a whole reflects the development of my research
> interests/activity over long time.
>
>
> OK, so what?:
>
>
> Preserving hand/working libraries of individual researchers
> (professors, researchers) may become especially important if one
> curates research collections of experts if one wishes to follow
> changes in collection concepts or even the development of scientific
> hypotheses and their "solutions" in context of a scientific legacy.
> Hand libraries are far more than just a pile of papers and xerox
> copies. Often they include connected correspondence about a scientific
> content. Sometimes, xeroxed copies from articles in hand libraries -
> while still available electronically - contain the author's comments
> and scribbles while she/he was reading the paper, and so provide
> valuable opinions or critiques or alternatives that reviewers perhaps
> have overlooked. Hand libraries include unpublished (but valuable)
> research data sets and observations, protocols to experiments (even if
> experiments failed) and details to old techniques and methods. Such
> protocols may sometimes be more precise and more to the detail than in
> method's sections of published articles (because in older literature
> methodology sections were of less interest or had sometimes to be
> shortened on "command" of reviewers). Hand libraries may contain
> fotographs, notes and sketches of ideas that were never further
> followed or realized, or just contain documents of historic interest.
> Even collections of obituaries within a research area give an idea
> about a person's ancient scientific network, which can be extremely
> interesting for following up changes in scientific concepts (e.g., who
> is working with whom ? Who shares the same ideas with whom ? What team
> or school followed a different concept ?). Portions of a hand library
> may inform about the history of an entire discipline, industry branch,
> societal developments, or changes in climatic conditions of a
> geographic region where the person once had worked. Usually, hand
> libraries are organized by their creators, either using an electronic
> tool or an analogue cardfile system. These are the key to a hand
> library to spot a research topic or article/file relatively quickly.
> Thus, hand libraries are searchable and may help to recognize the
> researcher's thread of thought.
>
> I just experienced all these things during my own previous curatorial
> work in micropaleo collections and especially while using an important
> archive and legacy on the Geology of Trinidad.
>
>
> Unfortunately not every librarian is recognizing (can't recognize
> because its outside of their expertise) the value/importance of
> extended hand libraries and so do not put the necessary care and
> effort to merge orphaned hand libraries into a manageable system
> (which of course costs man power). The result is, that valuable
> literature collections, or blocs of them is discarded or becomes
> disentangled (and so loosing internal links and context) and then
> given as isolates to antiquariats. Even duplicates or triplicates of
> books, if available, are worth not to be discarded because there will
> come the day when only a single volume is available and then perhaps
> may be in a bad physical condition because the paper is altering and
> decaying. It is not seldom, that discarding hand libraries seems the
> cheaper and more satisfactory solution than keeping them organized for
> future researchers (seen so in universities and even in museums). But
> that is a fatal error ! We all are aware that electronic archival is
> not durable and so is no ultimate solution. Who in 200 years will be
> able to decipher our current pdfs and Microsoft's formats ? In
> contrast, ancient egyptian papyrus has survived thousands of years
> (under dry desert conditions...)
>
> In my opinion not taking care about hand libraries of researchers
> is loss of science! (not to forget the amount of funding money and
> personal efforts that once had to be raised to carry out all the
> research).
>
>
> It is sometimes also the attitude of younger scientists that
> everything older than about 1986-1990 (in about the period when pdf's
> raised to be common) is useless as everything older is out of interest
> and new and important are available in electronic format. What a
> misconception ! Many questions sparkling around in old science books
> have not scientifically been solved yet; taking them up in a modified
> perspective old ideas may lead to vibrating new research by using
> newest technologies. Sometimes, one may get a clue from older
> literature or hand libraries why some ideas/concepts were once
> followed while others remained in the drawers (these were not always
> reasons by logical scientific thinking but had sometimes to do with
> the power of individual experts).
>
>
> I am just disappointed seeing that there is so little interest in
> keeping blocks of hand libraries of individuals.
>
> They are often the "brain" and source of brilliant ideas to the
> scientific legacy of a researcher, even if it was not Charles Darwin.
>
>
> More care and thoughts should be given on that matter.
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> PD Dr. Michael Knappertsbusch
> Curator for micropaleontology
> Natural History Museum Basel
> West-European Micropaleontological Reference Center for the DSDP/ODP/IODP
> Augustinergasse 2
> 4001-Basel
> Switzerland
>
> Tel. +41-61-266 55 64
> Fax. +41-61-266 55 46
>
> Email: michael.knappertsbusch at unibas.ch
> Internet: http://micropal-basel.unibas.ch
> Homepage Museum: http://www.nmbs.ch
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Von:* PaleoNet <paleonet-bounces at lists.paleonet.org> im Auftrag von
> Tony Wright via PaleoNet <paleonet at lists.paleonet.org>
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 3. April 2024 03:58:20
> *An:* 'A communications system for paleontologists.'
> *Cc:* Tony Wright
> *Betreff:* [EXTERN] Re: PaleoNet: Downsizing
>
> Hi John,
>
> Good to hear from your message and /Nomen nudum/ that you are still in
> the land of the living. Your message is very interesting!
>
> I have a query for you about personal libraries. Given the reluctance
> of institutional libraries in general to find space, resources and
> general interest in absorbing these libraries (for instance, see the
> fate of the Dorothy Hill/UQ departmental library) have you seen this
> problem discussed anywhere? What has happened with GA folk in recent
> years? I know that Des and Barry Webby passed on stuff to Londonderry
> (and so have I, but only largely unwanted stuff), but this must be a
> general problem, Like you I have spent a lot of $ collecting stuff and
> I have lots of the usual freebies which are now unobtainable.
>
> Just a continuing thought.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Tony
>
> *From:*PaleoNet [mailto:paleonet-bounces at lists.paleonet.org] *On
> Behalf Of *John Laurie via PaleoNet
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 2 April 2024 11:25 PM
> *To:* A communications system for paleontologists.
> *Cc:* John Laurie
> *Subject:* PaleoNet: Downsizing
>
> Paleonetters,
>
> Downsizing is hard.
>
> https://blotreport.com/2024/03/31/old-friends/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.paleonet.org/pipermail/paleonet/attachments/20240403/f558265a/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the PaleoNet
mailing list